U.S. Equities

Value on the rebound?

U.S. equities recovered sharply after the 4th quarter’s selloff, with the S&P 500® delivering its best start since 1998 and best quarter overall since 2009.
May 2019

U.S. equities recovered sharply after the fourth quarter’s selloff, with the S&P 500® delivering its best start to the year since 1998 and best quarter overall since 2009. Drivers of the first quarter’s reversal included renewed optimism regarding a U.S.-China trade deal and a dovish Federal Reserve.

 

Low-quality, risk rally

Consistent in a high-returning market environment, higher-risk companies with lower financial quality were some of the best performers. Pro-risk sentiment was largely evident at the sector level, where technology and industrials led on an improved outlook for China and trade, while energy and consumer discretionary were not far behind, in part due to the recovery in oil prices and improving U.S. consumer confidence.

Factor performance - most recent quarter and trailing one year

Value on the rebound - Factor performance

Source: FactSet, Axioma, Russell and BMO Global Asset Management

Momentum correction

The quarter’s market reversal triggered a momentum correction, as market leadership transitioned from the fourth-quarter’s flight to quality. Market breadth, a metric that measures the degree of concentration in market leadership, has historically been a reliable predictor for momentum corrections. In particular, some of the most challenging environments for price momentum have occurred in narrow markets. After the first quarter’s momentum correction, market breadth in the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 universes has broadened, suggesting that the momentum correction has stabilized.

 

Underperformance of value

A consistent theme from last year was the continued underperformance of attractively valued securities in the market. More expensive growth companies quickly recovered from their December low, resulting in the underperformance of value.

 

Insights from Market Monitor

Value investing has had its fair share of challenges in recent years. 2018 was no exception, as the most expensive ten-percent of companies within the Russell 1000® and Russell 2000® universes outpaced the cap-weighted benchmark return by 16.1% and 11.6%, respectively (chart 1 and 2).

Chart 1 and 2 | 2018 valuation performance: Russell 2000 and Russell 1000

Value on the rebound - Chart 1 and Chart 2 - 2018 valuation performances

Source: FactSet, Axioma, Russell and BMO Global Asset Management

However, as we look ahead, the relative attractiveness of valuation factors has greatly improved. Following such extreme levels of outperformance by the most expensive stocks in the market, a dislocation has developed, which has historically been a reliable predictor for the forward returns to valuations.

Valuation spreads, which measure the degree of separation between cheap and expensive stocks in the market, have widened in the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 universes to a 0.9 and 1.2 standard deviation dislocation, respectively (chart 3).

Related Capability

Learn more about our U.S. Equities capabilities.

Chart 3 | Valuation spreads (Russell 1000 and 2000)

Value on the rebound - Chart 3 Valuation spreads

Source: FactSet, Axioma, Russell and BMO Global Asset Management

Historically, wide valuation spreads have been a positive indicator for the forward returns to valuation factors. In fact, some of the most notable value rallies have occurred in market environments where valuation spreads have exceeded a reading of 1.0 standard deviation wide (charts 4 and 5).

Chart 4 and 5 | Large-cap universe (Russell 1000) and small-cap universe (Russell 2000)

Value on the rebound - Chart 4 and 5 Large-cap and small-cap universes

Source: FactSet, Axioma, Russell and BMO Global Asset Management

While valuation factors have had a difficult stretch of performance, 2018’s dominance by the most expensive stocks in the market has created a dislocation in valuation spreads, which has historically been a prelude to outperformance valuation. We continue to stay true to our time-tested beliefs by emphasizing company valuations as a part of our multi-dimensional stock selection process.

 

The S&P 500® Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 large-cap U.S. stocks.
The Russell 1000® Index is an index of approximately 1,000 of the largest companies in the U.S. equity market.
The Russell 2000® Index measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe.
Investments cannot be made in an index.
Beta is a measure of a portfolio’s volatility. Statistically, beta is the covariance of the portfolio in relation to the market. A beta of 1.00 implies perfect historical correlation of movement with the market. A higher beta manager will rise and fall more rapidly than the market, whereas a lower beta manager will rise and fall slower.

Related articles

No posts matching your criteria
April 2020

The opportunity in small and microcap equity

Small and microcap valuations appear close to approaching previous recessionary lows, and previous market rebounds have been led by small and microcap.

March 2020

Market volatility continues to increase as investors price in the economic impact of COVID-19

On March 17, 2020, the VIX closed at an all-time high (82.7), surpassing levels from the height of the Financial Crisis in 2008.

March 2020

Low volatility investing

Episode 101: Chris Jenks returns to the show to discuss the ins and outs of low volatility investing and its potential impact on portfolios during times of market volatility.

January 2020

Low volatility equities: Why now, why active?

Against the backdrop of rising volatility and expensive valuations for risk reduction, an active low volatility strategy that empowers investors to reduce risk at reasonable cost while maintaining equity upside for the long-term is imperative now more than ever.

December 2019

Exploring the Low Volatility Anomaly

Chris Jenks of BMO's Disciplined Equities Team discusses the Low Volatility Anomaly, and why the approach you take in this space matters.

November 2019

Are we closer to a U.S. recession?

Fears of a U.S. recession are widespread. These worries have been fed by the inverted Treasury bond yield curve – a reliable predictor of recessions in the past. Trade tensions increase the risks.

November 2019

Low volatility investing for the late cycle

Amid slowing economic growth and depressed market sentiment, cracks are emerging in how institutional asset managers have evaluated risk versus value during the recent 10-year bull market.

October 2019

Q3 2019 Disciplined Equities Market Update

U.S. large cap equities finished the volatile third quarter in positive territory, whereas small cap equities underperformed.

October 2019

A case for active investing in low volatility equity

As many investors take a closer look at low volatility strategies, an important question is whether to choose an actively managed or passive approach.

January 2019

Incorporating low volatility equity into a strategic allocation

We discuss how a strategic allocation to low volatility may help an investor achieve various outcomes and how it fits into a broader portfolio.

December 2018

Hedging against FAANG optimism

Even though FAANGs are revered as pillars of the U.S. stock market, there might be a better way to out-distance the broad-market index over the long term.

June 2018

The case for microcap investing

Investors are warming to the benefits of microcap, in particular its higher return potential paired with multiple benefits in an asset allocation framework.